| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
bucktailre-enactor First Sergeant
Joined: 23 Mar 2006 Posts: 24

|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 3:02 pm Post subject: Authentic Reenacting |
|
|
| I would like to know what people consider authentic reenacting. any replies are appricated. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
N.W.15thAR Captain
Joined: 07 Mar 2006 Posts: 167

|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 7:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you want to be completely authentic....no tent, no modern things, one blanket, and so on.
now if you want to be authentic I think you can have a one or two modern things to help with comfort (extra blanket, sleeping bag, hand warmers) or things that you "need" (cell phone, laptop.) Personally if you want to bring that stuff, go ahead, just keep it in your tent covered up. In my unit we are required to keep our tents closed and all of our modern things hidden in boxes or under our blanket. The only modern things I bring are my phone (mom makes me) some hand warmers for those really cold nights and an extra blanket, thats about it. As far as gear, I have a stainless steel canteen and mucket, just for convinence so I'm not cleaning them all the time. everything else Is pretty authentic.
Pvt. Gale
N.W. 15th Arkansas |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bucktailre-enactor First Sergeant
Joined: 23 Mar 2006 Posts: 24

|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 6:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
csaharty Corporal
Joined: 24 Mar 2008 Posts: 3 Location: Waverly, Ohio

|
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 9:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Each group has different standards it seems. You may well hear the terms, "mainstream', progressive, campaigner and hardcore.
While there can be many definitions, here is a nutshell for each.
Mainstream...least level of authenticity, usually someone brand new who doesn't know any bette and has not researched thouroughly aspects of their impression.
Progressive...suggests 'progressing' towards the best level of authenticity possible. Many reenactors fall in this category.
campaigner is generally one who is more in the hobby to satisfy their own questions of what is was like.
hardcore is generally one who is caught up in the details of it all. In my experience, this is the stich counter who justifies their criticism of those with less zeal than them in the name of honoring the man to the fullest who fought in the war.
In the end, one must answer 'authenticity' for themselves. I'd suggest thourough research. They do what your budge and time allow.
After all, there is more to reenacting. And that realization well may be the best way to honor those 'fighting men'. _________________ "There they lay, the blue and the gray intermingled; the same rich, young American blood flowing out in little rivulets of crimson; each thinking he was right." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|